Відео

Yes!

One can see why Critical Thinking is rarely taught in “those Liberal Colleges” in this day and age. They want sheep to lead.

I find your explanation of Onomatopoeia a bit confusing, because I think you add a negative value when you explain the use of creative words. I do not understand why creative words, can't be used or missused like other words, concious or unconcious, to create a laugh, ease up angst in a group, show alternatives, deepening a conversation etc. Creative words can be made by kids and used by a family, be used by someone who does not know a cultures language when trying to communicate or in friendely conversations among friends and family. I do not think we should be afraid if we hear newly made up words. Does all scholars agree that using words in new ways has a negative value? Beside that, your presentation gave me food for thoughts, I have never learned about rhetorics, and this was an interesting taste of new knowledge for me 😊.

Thank you kind Sir.. this is the single greatest overview and priceless advice I've found along my journey ...especially the end because despite being kindhearted I had fallen into these trappings becoming isolated from friends and family i can finally see a summit of mountain ive climbed a hundred times over only to find myself starting up again from its base. I had failed in Ethos and Kairos ...Kairos seems most important like rhythm is to the dance

You are probably the only person I am aware of that could see the jest in Maxwell's Demon illustration Another etymological connection lost in translation is "entropy" and "trope" sharing the pie root "Trep" as in trepidation (to turn) and that which makes the world turn ⭕ It's also quite satirical that the letter Q is a universal syntax for heat regarding the laws of dynamics as well as shadowy mythical cult leader in modern culture shining brightly the artificial spotlight of mainstream influence of which has blinded so many on the Christian dominated so called extreme far right to which their eyes are no longer acclimated to "the darkness" and the inferential occultations of a broader reality

Excellent. Thank you

Peace be with all

No mention of Canaanites 😂😂😂😂

Rhetoric? Those look like boobs! Sorry it’s Friday and I’m feeling silly

if you stop with the pauses every.............mid sentence..........................then this video..................with it's excelejt content..................................can be.................................................................................half the time

Mumbo jumbo

Invaluable exposure in this day and age. Very grateful for the format and presentation, and also for the improved sound in more recent posts.

hermetic or not..the Kyballion is life changing!

❤❤❤🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾

Thank you for pointing out that Livy’s perspective is critical because he gives us the perspective of an actual Rome writing about Roman history. I was in a college bookstore the other day and I spent some time looking through the classical history section…they had no ancient writers!! It was all modern perspectives on the past-it should be the opposite, don’t you think? Shouldn’t we read the writings of people that lived back then and maybe have a sprinkling of modern perspectives on history?? I mean read it all, but for a college bookstore to have no ancient writers…that was pretty disturbing to me.

the lack of context to these videos are confusing

Bố thách các con ạ

Sorry if this is out of context. Wasn’t sure who to ask. I’m painting a mural for my husband based on the teachings of Samael, on it I’m writing in Latin the meaning of VITRIOL, when I searched for references, every other rendition is different from Samaels. It reads “(Visita Interiora Terrae Rectificando Invenies Occultum Lapidem”) While Samaels book it reads ( Visitam Interiori Terra Rectifictur Invenian Ocultum Lapidum) I just wasn’t sure if the version opposing Samaels is some demonic distortion. Or if they literally mean the same thing. It’s just the last piece of this mural I’ve slaved away at and would hate to write the wrong meaning. Sorry if this is random, if you have an insight on this matter I would greatly appreciate it 🙏

Bravo! I have a PhD in Rhetoric and Writing, and I’m going to share this with my students this fall.

Interesting stuff right here

So this is the first section. Do you have videos on the others? Or is there a complete book somewhere to buy? I gotta know the rest!

I love learning

The chrone-the crow and sinchronicity. The pent- ogram of the witches = tet-ra-gram-aton. Pent-atcouch. Ser-pent. Re-pent

Thank you! Thank you very much!

this is an important video!! thanks for making it!!!

One species of human. But many races. Or is there only one type of dog, cat, etc? I don't get how people can look at humanity and think everyone's the same. Hate need not be included. We are different and that's good

Just want to say a quick and heartfelt thank you for all of your videos and the cut of your jib when presenting these amazing truthful ideas but this video above all shows true humility and a wanting for a better world and that lets me know I have found a very good Channel and a better man.

Translated from Hebrew, pfffft... If thats your source i'll give it a miss. Ancient Hebrew only has about 8K words, nothing of note was ever written in ancient Hebrew. You want the Original Greek!

Making up stuff to try and unseat god so pedophiles can rule over people is an actual sin, unlike sex. If you guys do somehow against all odds manage to create a infinite hell with your evil religions, you are the ones who are going in it.

Nice 👍

Hey what's with all these stuff ! Christians now believe in myhthologicals too ? Or is it like a new fad.

53 minutes and you managed to end in a high note 👏👏 this is cinema

Look at Dr David A Hillman @ladybabylon

I love the artwork at @15:20 can anyone please identify for me? <3

45:47 started poor and made millions with this key.

Can you elaborate on thracians in book x of odyssey? Or reference a source?

As a practionioner of the “science of images” - so basically astral magic - I can say that against actual empirical results the theoretical criticism of Aquino just can’t measure up

Jw the same symbolism is attributed to all the planets, but this is not the origin. Do you know of it and how old it is?

There is only 1 spirit. 1 not in number but as a whole. The one within itself. The eternal. No beginning no end. Angels are all the different HU man beings Hu being all the different shades

Rhetoric the art to have a silver tongue of bullshit and lies.

Hemetism is all a lie anyway. Trimigistus was a goat thief, liar and a con artist. And protects theives and traveller's, when travellers were known to be theives. And any strangers to just walk into any town townfolk were to be wiery of. Nobody can trust the locals let alone the outsiders when survival of the finest was all there was as reality and today. It's still the same day. That is reality. surival, don't trust this situation or anything from Hermes,even the Kaballion. Miss! Never trust a jew!!

There are clever things to say and clever ways to say things. Often, the user hears the cleverness and and accepts the information because the "clever" speaker must have more information than the listener.

Duh. Im only mad about all the damages. Heal and restore all back perfectly or else. And leave me alone criminals . No one is above the law

Excellent.

How is it that in the age of Saturn there was no difference between freedom and slavery, the rich and the poor, and then it is said that in the time of Saturnalia, the roles change, slaves are masters, masters are slaves? I wouldn't say, people are the worst kind, there have always been those who are powerful, and oppressed, regardless of the period. Unfortunately, this is still the case today, and I believe in the future as well. The Saturnalia were just a valve where the rulers, for the purpose of their pleasure-living, would allow the conquered to inhale a little fresh energy, in order to further abuse them even more. "Golden age" - maybe, but only for the rulers.

So who is at the very top of all of this?

Plutarh is one of the best, i love reading his writings as if they were done few decades ago not like from century I

Christ never left.

I've grown pretty convinced over the years that rhetoric and speech devices are really just manipulation.. and now I'm pretty confident. We frame manipulation as a bad thing, yet when it's labeled "rhetoric", it's seen as good. I'd love to see some serious discussion over whether manipulation is inherently good or bad.

A bunch of crap!